711
Comparison

LangChain vs LlamaIndex

Both are Python/JS frameworks for LLM apps. LangChain leans agents; LlamaIndex leans RAG.

1 min readupdated 2026-06-22

/ quick answer

The two most-used LLM frameworks converge over time but each still has a philosophical center: LangChain wraps 'anything an LLM does' as chains and graphs; LlamaIndex specializes in getting the right data into the LLM. Both are Python/JS frameworks for LLM apps. LangChain leans agents; LlamaIndex leans RAG.

Both are Python/JS frameworks for LLM apps. LangChain leans agents; LlamaIndex leans RAG. The two most-used LLM frameworks converge over time but each still has a philosophical center: LangChain wraps 'anything an LLM does' as chains and graphs; LlamaIndex specializes in getting the right data into the LLM. Recommendation: Pick LlamaIndex if the app is 'answer questions over my data'. Pick LangGraph if it's 'agent that does things'. It's fine to use both.
Overview
The two most-used LLM frameworks converge over time but each still has a philosophical center: LangChain wraps 'anything an LLM does' as chains and graphs; LlamaIndex specializes in getting the right data into the LLM.
Differences
DimensionOption AOption B
Sweet spotLangChain: agent orchestration (LangGraph)LlamaIndex: RAG pipelines
Data loadersMany, community-maintainedDeeper, first-class (LlamaHub)
ObservabilityLangSmith (excellent)Third-party (Arize, LangFuse)
API stabilityHistorically churnyMore stable since v0.10+
CommunityLargest LLM frameworkStrong, RAG-focused
Use Cases
  • →LangChain for multi-step agents, tool routing, stateful graphs.
  • →LlamaIndex for advanced RAG (query engines, sub-question, graph indexes).
Recommendation
Pick LlamaIndex if the app is 'answer questions over my data'. Pick LangGraph if it's 'agent that does things'. It's fine to use both.
Related Tool Stacks

/ frequently asked

What is the difference in LangChain vs LlamaIndex?

The two most-used LLM frameworks converge over time but each still has a philosophical center: LangChain wraps 'anything an LLM does' as chains and graphs; LlamaIndex specializes in getting the right data into the LLM.

What are the main points of comparison?

Sweet spot: LangChain: agent orchestration (LangGraph) vs LlamaIndex: RAG pipelines · Data loaders: Many, community-maintained vs Deeper, first-class (LlamaHub) · Observability: LangSmith (excellent) vs Third-party (Arize, LangFuse) · API stability: Historically churny vs More stable since v0.10+ · Community: Largest LLM framework vs Strong, RAG-focused

Which one should I choose?

Pick LlamaIndex if the app is 'answer questions over my data'. Pick LangGraph if it's 'agent that does things'. It's fine to use both.

/ continue exploring

Related concepts

The vocabulary this page depends on.

all dictionary →

Related workflows

Turn this into a repeatable process.

all workflows →

Related tool stacks

The tools that run it in production.

  • →RAG Starter Stack

    Minimum viable stack to ship a production RAG chatbot.

  • →Agent Research Stack

    Web-search-enabled agent for autonomous research tasks.

  • →AI Voice Agent Development Stack

    This stack outlines essential technologies and tools for building and deploying AI voice agents, encompassing speech processing, natural language understanding, and conversational AI frameworks. It provides a foundation for creating intelligent voice interfaces.

  • →A2A Orchestration Stack

    This stack comprises the essential tools and frameworks for designing, deploying, and managing Agent-to-Agent (A2A) communication protocols and multi-agent system orchestration. It provides the infrastructure for complex AI agent collaboration.

all tool stacks →

Comparisons & alternatives

Pick between the options.

all comparisons →

Long-form guides on this topic