n8n vs Make: Which Automation Platform to Pick
Self-hosted flexibility vs managed ease — pick by team, volume and data sensitivity.
/ quick answer
n8n and Make (formerly Integromat) are the two serious contenders for visual AI/data automation in 2026. n8n is open-source and self-hostable; Make is fully managed with a slicker UI and a bigger app catalogue. Self-hosted flexibility vs managed ease — pick by team, volume and data sensitivity.
| Dimension | Option A | Option B |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self-host (Docker/VPS) or n8n Cloud | Fully managed SaaS only |
| Pricing model | Free self-hosted; Cloud from ~$20/mo | Per-operation, from free tier to enterprise |
| App catalogue | ~500 nodes + universal HTTP node | 2,000+ native app integrations |
| Code flexibility | First-class JS/Python code node | Limited code sandbox (JSON tools) |
| Data residency | Runs anywhere you deploy it | EU or US regions on Make cloud |
| Best learning curve | Steeper — devs love it | Gentler — ops teams pick it up in a day |
- →n8n → sensitive data flows, dev-heavy teams, high-volume cheap execution
- →Make → non-technical teams, wide app coverage, fast time-to-first-flow
Is n8n really free?
The community edition is free to self-host under the Sustainable Use License. n8n Cloud and the Enterprise edition are paid.
Which has more integrations, n8n or Make?
Make has more native app integrations (2,000+). n8n has ~500 native nodes plus a universal HTTP node that covers any REST API.
Can Make handle sensitive customer data?
Make offers EU or US data regions but still runs as multi-tenant SaaS. For strict data residency, on-prem or air-gapped needs, self-hosted n8n is a safer default.
Which is easier to learn?
Make. Its UI, error messages and scenario builder are more polished for non-technical users. n8n rewards developer instincts and code-node fluency.
- Make — 1 month Pro freevisit ↗Start with the managed option; migrate to n8n later if needed.
Some links support Onexial at no extra cost to you.