Liquidity Analysis Prompt
Quantifies real exit liquidity for a token: pool depth, provider concentration, lock status and impact at realistic sizes.
/ quick answer
Use before entering any position outside majors, and again before scaling up. Quantifies real exit liquidity for a token: pool depth, provider concentration, lock status and impact at realistic sizes.
Assess the real exit liquidity for this token. Volume is not liquidity — analyse depth. TOKEN + chain: [DATA] Pools (venue, paired asset, TVL, fee tier): [DATA] LP concentration (top providers, % share): [DATA] Lock status + expiry: [DATA] 24h volume vs TVL: [DATA] Output: 1. Total realistic exit depth, excluding pools too thin to matter. 2. Price impact for exits of $10k, $50k, $250k. 3. LP concentration risk: how much depth could vanish in one transaction, and who controls it. 4. Lock analysis: what unlocks when, and the impact if that liquidity leaves. 5. Volume/TVL read: is turnover organic or wash-like? 6. Maximum position size that remains exitable in one day under 3% impact. 7. Monitoring rules: metric, threshold, source. State clearly if the token is effectively unexitable at meaningful size.
Usable depth: $860k across two pools; three others under $20k are irrelevant. Impact: $10k → 1.1%, $50k → 5.4%, $250k → 23%. Concentration: one LP controls 58% of depth and can withdraw in a single transaction. Lock: 40% expires in 19 days. Volume/TVL of 6.2 with repeating equal-size trades suggests wash activity. Max exitable size: ~$28k. Monitor pool TVL daily, alert on a 25% drop.
What does the Liquidity Analysis Prompt prompt do?
Use before entering any position outside majors, and again before scaling up.
Which AI models work with this prompt?
It is model-agnostic: it works with any capable general model. Replace the bracketed variables with your own context before running it.
What output should I expect?
Usable depth: $860k across two pools; three others under $20k are irrelevant. Impact: $10k → 1.1%, $50k → 5.4%, $250k → 23%. Concentration: one LP controls 58% of depth and can withdraw in a single transaction. Lock: 40% expires in 19 days. Volume/TVL of 6.2 with repeating equal-size trades suggests.
/ continue exploring
Related concepts
The vocabulary this page depends on.
- →Liquidity Pool
A liquidity pool is a smart contract holding two or more assets that traders swap against, with prices set by the pool's formula rather than an order book.
- →Smart Contract
A smart contract is code deployed to a blockchain that executes deterministically when called, holding balances and enforcing rules without an operator.
- →Bridge
A bridge moves value between blockchains by locking or burning on one side and issuing a representation on the other.
- →Prompt Injection
An attack where hostile input hijacks the LLM's instructions, causing it to leak data or misbehave.
Related workflows
Turn this into a repeatable process.
- →Monitor Liquidity
Watch the pools you depend on for exit liquidity, so a position becomes unexitable only in theory, not by surprise.
- →DeFi Yield Research Workflow
Evaluate a yield opportunity by decomposing where the return comes from and what has to break for it to disappear.
Related tool stacks
The tools that run it in production.
- →On-chain Research Stack
Explorer, indexer and analytics layers combined so wallet and token questions get answered with verifiable data.
- →DeFi Execution Stack
Web3 wallet, DEX aggregator, DeFi protocols and a portfolio tracker — the toolset for actually deploying capital on-chain.
Related prompts
Reusable prompts for this job.
- →Crypto Risk Analysis Prompt
Runs a pre-mortem on a position or protocol: enumerates failure modes, likelihood, impact and observable early warnings.
- →DeFi Protocol Research Prompt
Decomposes a protocol's yield source, contract risk, oracle dependency and exit path into a written risk verdict.
- →Smart Contract Risk Prompt
Reviews contract facts for the patterns that let a deployer or attacker take user funds.
- →Yield Comparison Prompt
Compares yield opportunities on a risk-adjusted basis instead of ranking them by advertised APY.
Related use cases
How people apply it, and what came out.
- →Monitor Liquidity
Depth monitoring across 9 positions flagged three tokens as effectively unexitable at their current size, forcing a resize before it mattered.
- →Discover DeFi Opportunities
Ranking yields by real fee-based return instead of advertised APY moved capital from a 31% headline position to an 8.4% sustainable one.
- →Use DeFi With A Web3 Wallet
A first-time DeFi user moved from an exchange to self-custody with a test-transfer routine and a 2% allocation cap, avoiding two protocol failures.
Comparisons & alternatives
Pick between the options.
- →DeFi vs Traditional Finance
DeFi offers open access, composability and transparent rules; traditional finance offers legal recourse, insurance and stability.
- →Smart Money vs Technical Analysis
Smart money tracking reads who is positioning; technical analysis reads how price behaves. They answer different questions and fail differently.