Liquidity Analysis Prompt
Quantifies real exit liquidity for a token: pool depth, provider concentration, lock status and impact at realistic sizes.
/ quick answer
Use before entering any position outside majors, and again before scaling up. Quantifies real exit liquidity for a token: pool depth, provider concentration, lock status and impact at realistic sizes.
Assess the real exit liquidity for this token. Volume is not liquidity — analyse depth. TOKEN + chain: [DATA] Pools (venue, paired asset, TVL, fee tier): [DATA] LP concentration (top providers, % share): [DATA] Lock status + expiry: [DATA] 24h volume vs TVL: [DATA] Output: 1. Total realistic exit depth, excluding pools too thin to matter. 2. Price impact for exits of $10k, $50k, $250k. 3. LP concentration risk: how much depth could vanish in one transaction, and who controls it. 4. Lock analysis: what unlocks when, and the impact if that liquidity leaves. 5. Volume/TVL read: is turnover organic or wash-like? 6. Maximum position size that remains exitable in one day under 3% impact. 7. Monitoring rules: metric, threshold, source. State clearly if the token is effectively unexitable at meaningful size.
Usable depth: $860k across two pools; three others under $20k are irrelevant. Impact: $10k → 1.1%, $50k → 5.4%, $250k → 23%. Concentration: one LP controls 58% of depth and can withdraw in a single transaction. Lock: 40% expires in 19 days. Volume/TVL of 6.2 with repeating equal-size trades suggests wash activity. Max exitable size: ~$28k. Monitor pool TVL daily, alert on a 25% drop.
/ frequently asked
What does the Liquidity Analysis Prompt prompt do?
Use before entering any position outside majors, and again before scaling up.
Which AI models work with this prompt?
It is model-agnostic: it works with any capable general model. Replace the bracketed variables with your own context before running it.
How do I use this prompt?
1) Copy the prompt with the copy button. 2) Replace every bracketed variable with your real details. 3) Paste it into your AI assistant. 4) Compare the answer with the example output and ask for changes if needed.
What output should I expect?
Usable depth: $860k across two pools; three others under $20k are irrelevant. Impact: $10k → 1.1%, $50k → 5.4%, $250k → 23%. Concentration: one LP controls 58% of depth and can withdraw in a single transaction. Lock: 40% expires in 19 days. Volume/TVL of 6.2 with repeating equal-size trades suggests.
/ continue exploring
Related concepts
The vocabulary this page depends on.
- →Liquidity Pool
A liquidity pool is a smart contract holding two or more assets that traders swap against, with prices set by the pool's formula rather than an order book.
- →Smart Contract
A smart contract is code deployed to a blockchain that executes deterministically when called, holding balances and enforcing rules without an operator.
- →Bridge
A bridge moves value between blockchains by locking or burning on one side and issuing a representation on the other.
- →Prompt Injection
An attack where hostile input hijacks the LLM's instructions, causing it to leak data or misbehave.
Related workflows
Turn this into a repeatable process.
- →Monitor Liquidity
Watch the pools you depend on for exit liquidity, so a position becomes unexitable only in theory, not by surprise.
- →DeFi Yield Research Workflow
Evaluate a yield opportunity by decomposing where the return comes from and what has to break for it to disappear.
Related tool stacks
The tools that run it in production.
- →On-chain Research Stack
Explorer, indexer and analytics layers combined so wallet and token questions get answered with verifiable data.
- →DeFi Execution Stack
Web3 wallet, DEX aggregator, DeFi protocols and a portfolio tracker — the toolset for actually deploying capital on-chain.
Related prompts
Reusable prompts for this job.
- →Crypto Risk Analysis Prompt
Runs a pre-mortem on a position or protocol: enumerates failure modes, likelihood, impact and observable early warnings.
- →DeFi Protocol Research Prompt
Decomposes a protocol's yield source, contract risk, oracle dependency and exit path into a written risk verdict.
- →Smart Contract Risk Prompt
Reviews contract facts for the patterns that let a deployer or attacker take user funds.
- →Yield Comparison Prompt
Compares yield opportunities on a risk-adjusted basis instead of ranking them by advertised APY.
Related use cases
How people apply it, and what came out.
- →Monitor Liquidity
Depth monitoring across 9 positions flagged three tokens as effectively unexitable at their current size, forcing a resize before it mattered.
- →Discover DeFi Opportunities
Ranking yields by real fee-based return instead of advertised APY moved capital from a 31% headline position to an 8.4% sustainable one.
- →Use DeFi With A Web3 Wallet
A first-time DeFi user moved from an exchange to self-custody with a test-transfer routine and a 2% allocation cap, avoiding two protocol failures.
Comparisons & alternatives
Pick between the options.
- →DeFi vs Traditional Finance
DeFi offers open access, composability and transparent rules; traditional finance offers legal recourse, insurance and stability.
- →Smart Money vs Technical Analysis
Smart money tracking reads who is positioning; technical analysis reads how price behaves. They answer different questions and fail differently.